February 10, 2010
-
Racism Vs. Preference
When I wrote my love letter to White women (A Love Letter To White Women), I received quite a number of comments asking why I focus on race. Considering my recent campaign against racism, it’s a valid question.
It had nothing to do with race. I wrote a love letter to a specific group of women, like I do with a specific gender of human beings.
What bothers me however, are comments like the ones below:
insert_label_here_003: “dang no letter to black women? I am appalled *sarcasm ends here**”ghostsoft@ireallylikefood: “get past the racist posts or im going to block you and unfriend you. i cant take this anymore. TY”
This is one of the reasons I wrote it, because of such people who make it racist to even acknowledge the beauty of a White woman. It saddens me, almost to a point of tears when I think of how a person can be denied of being beautiful and reduced to an excuse for racism. What has the world come to?
A great deception in our society is that Caucasians are the most attractive race when everyone is beautiful in their own way. This has created an atmosphere of jealousy and hatred, unfortunately. It has become a major cause for White oppression.
Well I’m not here to feed into the bullshit and be politically correct. I’m tired of people making White women feel insecure and ugly. I’m tired of people saying they look like corpses because of their skin colour.
White women are beautiful too, and they have feelings! If my words can make them feel better about themselves and I’m the only one willing to do what it takes, then so be it.
soymilk: “Ricky, too bad you won't be pulling any of ‘em.”Hilarious, because she’s right. It’s not as if girls actually go for the physically disabled anyway.
So they might hunt, condemn, and set the dogs on me. I don’t care. I’m the romantic Batman… in a wheelchair. Yeah seriously, don’t set the dogs on Ricky!!!
But all of this has made me wonder, does preference in attraction (physical features, skin colour, culture, etc.) play a role in racism?
Beauty after all, is in the eye of the beholder.
Reader, is it wrong to have racial preference? Do you have a racial preference in the attraction department? If so, what is it?
Comments (123)
i dont, because it does not matter. equality is the key.
looks play a part for me, but not race. its whatever i suppose. but i'm married so my opinion doesnt matter. lol.
no preference. if you are beautiful, you are beautiful. inside and out.
I like variety, so I don't limit myself to one race. I date pretty much across the board. Limiting yourself to specific race, limits your chance at true happiness.
I like whites and Asians =-P but it doesnt really matter as long as there a good person who I love and loves me...
im not gonna lie. they way my mother raised me was ot believe certain things about black guys. so i usually subconsciously(i think) go fro white guys. i enjoyed your blog but i thought it was sarcasm or a joke....thats sad haha. im glad you wrote this blog after that one though. and i agree. if you wouldve wrote a blog to a black woman people wouldve probably commented "oh thats so beautiful" but it'd be nothing but pity. it's like that movie Remember The Titans. pitying black is being just as prejudice as hating them (and im mixed). and hating whites is not ok just as neither is hating blacks. ok done rambling =]
eh. Asian/ white i just click better with them.
I actually really don't have a preference in my women; I tend to gravitate toward minorities, but I think that's just a case of the "exotic becomes erotic". But I also like women with very distinct features, like freckles, or strange-colored hair, or striking eyes. Women like Megan Fox bore me. They're just..."pretty" all around, with no identifying features.
In men, I typically go for the white nerdy boys. It's mostly white guys with darkish hair, facial hair, tall, and with broad shoulders. Don't ask me why, but that's all I've ever dated in men. It almost makes me a little ashamed that I'm not attracted to more in men, but then again, I always have been more sexually attracted to women anyway.
I don't think you're racist. I like all these posts. And I love how people get defensive and threaten to block you over your observations and opinions. Some great free-speech, free-thinking supportive community we have.
We are all beautiful, no matter what color, shape or size we are.
Your attracted to who your attracted to. If somebody has a problem with it, then thats their problem. =)
Personally, I've lately been attracted to men of the darker skin type. But all in all, skin color doesn't really matter to me.
I'll admit.
When it comes to relationships and the sort, I do prefer asian women.
That said, I hang out with everyone.
My best friend is brown, but he doesn't go to school with me.
My group at school consists of a 6'5 black guy, a 6'2 white guy, a 5'7 chinese guy, and me + 2 filipino guys.
There's nothing wrong with it.
There's only a problem when people create one.
I've dated mostly white but I've defiantly crushed on all sorts of people. I go more for the personality over looks anyway. *shrugs*
I really hate how much of your comments are people taking offence.. its like... stop reading. But, I bet you like it so I'll shut up.
I was always pretty open when I was a single gal. I think the differences that attract us make us who we are. I have friends who are naturally more attracted to a certain genre of men for various reasons. Race was never an issue for me. I used to call myself the United Nations: I loved 'em all!
I think it's funny that in the long run I married someone just like me: Irish mom/Sicilian dad, from the same neighborhood, somewhat raised in a strange time-warp by older parents, both deep thinkers and good cooks. Of course, we fell for each other 'cause it was love, the whole Irish-Sicilian American thing was just a bonus
PS: I've told you this before dear, dear Ricky - my mother married my father KNOWING he would one day be in a wheelchair. She loved him none-the-less and no matter what. Even after they split, she took care of him like the best friends they were. The wheelchair didn't matter. The person in it did. So go out there and get you a white girl!!!
I'm pretty sure a love letter doesn't have anything to do with being racist. Just because you like one thing doesn't mean you hate it's counterpart.
I, personally appreciate the letter. Even though it might not have been directed straight to me, it still made me feel a little better, so I thank you for that. It is not wrong to have a racial preference when it comes to things like this. I don't believe there is anything wrong with it, and those that do really just don't get it. Hasn't anyone heard someone say, "He's/She's not my type"? It's the same principle.
Thank you Ricky. I truly do appreciate it. =]
I don't think there is anything particularly wrong with having a racial preference. Beauty is something we are taught, something subjective. We cannot always be held entirely responsible for buying into some things we are taught, however we should make our best effort to correct what we have bought into which is wrong. Also, having a preference doesn't necessarily mean hatred or disgust of another race. I myself prefer white or asian men, but that doesn't mean that if I met a black man I got along with well that I would judge him entirely based on his looks ore even find him altogether unattractive. My boyfriend is not my ideal type, though he is white. He is heavy set and very tall. My preference is for slimmer men with a slight atheletic muscle tone and a bit shorter. But guess who I've been with for over three years? Yup, the chubby boyfriend. And I don't think he will be going anywhere soon.
My racial preference are definitely asians
but i don't mind other races as long as the person knows their background and embraces it.. I'm sick of "white" people lol italian, russian, german, french anything but just "white" 
you may not understand what I'm trying to say but i know what i like. lol
Also, @ Ricky: Nothing wrong with the romantic Batman in a wheelchair. You are sweet and talented. I am surprised the white women aren't knocking your door down to get to you. And if they aren't, they should be.
everyone who thought it was racist just went silent haha. Im glad that you arent afraid to say what you need to. People make race so taboo but it really shouldnt be. If your attracted to a certain race, so what? Some may call it racist, but its like being gay. You dont have a choice, you just naturally feel that way. As for the pricks trying to defriend you, screw em. Ill be here along with all the cool people.
I can honestly say that I don't have any gravitation towards any particular race; in the past, I have found myself deeply attracted to the member of the opposite sex from a variety of races. I think every race has something to contribute, and something profoundly fascinating about them.
Lol at this. Make a post to the white men now?
I don't know if it's really racial preference because I find certain people of every race attractive whenever they come along. On the other hand, if people look at who I've dated, then yes I'm probably racial preferable towards Asians -- particularly Chinese/Taiwanese. All of my past boyfriends are of that ethnicity and so is my current boyfriend. I'm not saying I'd reject someone because of their race, though.
i've noticed that too, you and your recent race posts. it's not like i'm about to block you or anything, i'd just rather hear your posts about the funny things, the entertaining things. like shit, and genitals.
I find all kind of people beautiful. I guess I've only dated white guys because they were most accessible and they were the only ones that ever approached me. But if I were single and a black, Hispanic, Asian, or any other kind of guy asked me out, I would go for it if I were into him! Color means nothing to me; there are going to be beautiful people and not-so-beautiful people in any race.
i dont think its racist to have a physical preferences about racial features but racist people usually do have a those kinds of preferences. preference can start to become negative/racist when you equate physical appearances with negative characteristics about a persons nature or personality. from what ive noticed most peoples attraction is a reflection of how they feel about their own looks. (like i know a lot of people who are attracted to people who share similar physical characteristics to themselves. and i know a few others who for example hate their noses so they tend to be attracted to white men because they have a stronger nose bridge.)
personally what attracts me most is certain bone structures, which can exclude certain races. the second thing i tend to be attracted to is any shade of brown skin, but this comes 2nd to a beautiful cheekbones and jawline no matter what the skin color.
It is a psychological thing in us too. So in a way it is racism in the sense of discrimination.
In many tests, on average, females picked masculine looking men for reproductive value. (Genes etc).
But picked more feminine looking males as a fatherly figure / long-term relationship.
I'd say we'd land in the latter of the boat.
@Niccee - Going 'gay' is 100% a choice! A bad choice! Men and Women of different races liking and loving each other is STILL Men and Women!
Remember when Jerry Seinfeld said something about liking Asian/Chinese women, Elaine piped in with "isn't that a little bit racist", to which Jerry retorted "if I like their race, how can that be racist?" ?!
I'm to a great degree a 'racist'/racialist, AND the vast majority of girls and women that I like are some form of Asian! Not all, but the most, by a long shot. There are Black, White, and often 'mixed' girls that I've liked.
I don't think it is a skin colour things so much as a cultural thing. When you are young you are adventurous and different is fascinating. I wanted to move to a kibbutz so I could almost guarantee myself the chance of meeting a foreigner. When you get married and start a famiily doing things a certain way, eating the same foods, valueing the same things is comforting and familiar. Even more so after your parents die and families move away. We are comfortable with people who do things the same way as us. Except for the brave few after we hit twenty five most people choose the path of least resistance with short bursts every now and then of inspiration. Every day we use generalisations and facts to help us make choices. Skin colour generally gives us an indication of culture. What people see as rejection based on skin colour is actually in my opinion a choice to embrace my own culture and doing what makes me comfortable. (I mean this for the majority of us. I personally don't believe that most people are rascist - I think we are just raised within a certain culture and are used to things a different way.)
To be completely honest, I'm normally only attracted to Caucasian men. I don't know why, because I do appreciate when a black man or Asian or Hispanic man is attractive, but normally he just won't be my type. However, that isn't to say that I rule out every race except white men as potential boyfriends or husbands.
I don't think it's really racist to have a preference either, and I'm really glad you wrote this post. Because I do think about it from time to time, about whether its racist of me to prefer white men, if its just fine. I'm glad that a lot of the comments are also about how they sometimes prefer one race to the next. As long as we're not hating on certain races over another or think "I'd never think of dating *insert race here*", it's not racism.
sorry we had some fun but our friendship is over. TY
Well, I have preferences, everyone has theirs, but they just may not know how to classify them or they may not even think that they have a specific type. Preferences are often subjective, and most of the times, I can't list out all the reasons for why I fall in love with someone. Maybe it's just instinct, or I dunno...
I don't really believe in discrimination. Whether that be through race, looks, gender, personality, etc. I think we should be open to everyone.
However I find it hilarious that when there were posts about people who only like skinny women... people defended it by saying "WELL THATS JUST PREFERENCE"
So everyone else can have a preference but you can't? Hm, that's pretty hypocritical.
I'm white and I've only dated asian but I think all types of guys/girls from different races can be hotties. But asians cook the best food...
People still take things far too seriously.
ASIANS...I don't have a lot of Caucasian or Black friends to start with...but wth? Whatever "rings your dong" right...LOL
@S_K_O_T - your ignorant and obviously in over your head
in my own opinion, absolutely not.
i'm typically only attracted to white men. that doesn't mean i hate black/asian/hispanic people or even that i think they're ugly, they're just not typically what i look for. and it also doesn't mean i wouldn't date someone of a different race. i prefer dark hair in a guy, and my boyfriend has blonde hair and i wouldn't change a thing about him. so preferences don't mean there are no exceptions.
but i think when you start having racial preferences toward friends, coworkers, employees (for employers), that it racist. you don't need to be attracted to those people, so there is no reason to pick a preference.
also, just because we're on the topic of racism, there is NO SUCH THING! as "reverse racism." if a white person hates black people, that is racism. if a black person hates white people, that is also racism. it's not "reverse" just because it's not typical.
I don't know that I have a racial preference, because I've never dated beyond black/latin men. Not to say that I don't find other men attractive, but they are usually attractive and spoken for in my case. I've found white men, oriental men and a host of other races to be attractive. What got me is that, I was interested in them, they weren't interested in me for one reason or another. I personally don't discriminate at least not racially. I discriminate when a guy is missing more than half his mouth, or when he has horrible hygiene, or bad manners or having too many damn children.
"A great deception in our society is that Caucasians are the most attractive race when everyone is beautiful in their own way." I'm sorry Sir, but where are you getting these facts, seriously? Who suddenly said that white people were prettier?
"I’m tired of people saying they look like corpses because of their skin colour."
Who the hell ever said that? Either you need to get your facts straight, or change the company you keep.
Frankly, I've never been around anyone who makes it necessary to emphasize the beauty of any group due to so-called discrimination. You're creating needless dichotomies.You point out that it's OTHERS (this vague, non-specific group who apparently say that white women are ugly...) who make the distinction necessary on your part, but really, you''re the one who's created the need to mention a racial group when really, it goes without saying that beauty is universal.
I think you're creating the distinction because of some strange need for pageviews. Please prove me wrong, because you seem like a good kid... but I ain't taking this sitting down.
I don't have a preference because the world is too full of assholes to limit myself to one race. However, I am kinda partial to Chinese men.
I tend to like people who appreciate some kind of background such as german, russian, asian from experience of who I've dated. But I think I'm pretty open, and currently it's been hard to find people.
I hate how everybody is so quick to point out racism these days even if sometimes its just in their head.....
I'm glad someone can acknowledge that we have feelings; it seems like people can say whatever the hell they want about white people w/o us being allowed to take offense.
Women from all races can be beautiful or attractive. It is really hard to just single out a certain race. That is, unless you have a preference of course. And that is perfectly fine. After all, it's a choice. We are free to choose.
I don't see it as a problem. Every guy I've been with has been either Latino or Latino descent. I just like guys who speak Spanish, they're hot
But I see it as liking girls with blonde hair, or guys who are muscular, or whatever - it's just a personal preference.
My mom, after being married for 23 years and having 3 kids, divorced my dad. Long story...but you know what? She fell in love again. With a handicapped man. It's possible Ricky...because luckily you're right, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
And as for your other point, I PREFER white males...but I am not anyhow racist. Each race comes with their different quirks. I guess I've never been attracted to anyone else other than whites (besides a couple *oh shit don't kill me comment trolls if I'm not fucking politically correct* black guys). Just because my heart and lusts are stronger for a particular race over another, doesn't make me nor anyone racist. Beauty is in my eye, the beholders. And that's what I find beautiful? Then so be it. Jeeshush!
I totally agree with you. I perfer white people when it comes to sexuality. Does that mean that I hate black? African? Indonesian? Chinese? Japanese? Etc? NO! I dated a man who was half chinese and I loved him DEARLY... I almost married the guy.
I am often looked at as racist in the same way.
I don't think it's wrong to have a racial preference as long as it's not based on negative stereotypes or racism. You like what you like. I try not to be judgmental of other races, although I admit I catch myself doing it sometimes because that's what I was taught growing up. I fully understand that what I was told to me is wrong (at least mostly - some people really are like their stereotypes), but such things have been ingrained into my psyche. I daresay we all have such things ingrained into our psyches and we have to make a conscious effort to change our thinking.
@Your_My_Beautiful_Disgrace - You're right, because personality is always better than looks. I mean the only reason I want you to be mine is because you agree with most of the things I write. I'm not drooling right now because you're so perfectly beautiful that I'm about to fall off my wheelchair! That's ridiculous, right?
Though, it could be your voice that I can't hear. I hope you never shut up so I could listen to your sweet nothings forever. You're soft spoken and articulate, remember?
@SimplyCe - Of course it's possible for others. I'm much more complicated you see, like a sexy mysterious stranger.
@loneXwolfe - Well I'm glad you do because that was the sole purpose, to make you feel good about yourself. (:
@pianomusicchick - They should? Ha, awesome. I need to get to the door now!
@Niccee - Didn't you know? I love making them put a cork in it with common sense for babies, haha. Glad to have you on my side!
@infinitelyalex - In time.
@andilynn77 - Your mom has a big heart. Thanks for the encouragement. (:
I don't have any racial preference. I grow up in an Eurasian family and have relatives of different races and beliefs, so race does not matter to me.
Hmmm-- I don't think about it much-- but now that you got me here... well, I guess my preferences lead more towards certain attributes and attitudes rather then color of skin... like hairy men-- I just don't dig it. Even sandy blond can be pulled off, but I don't generally prefer it. I think it is ok though, cause that just means someone else will come and find the person you don't find attractive very attractive... keeps the cat claws at bay and fists in place.
I'm a white male. I find all but one attractive but the top left is (for me) a stunner. Then again I have a thing about Japanese ladies anyway.
I don't think people should get too hung up on race – is it really that important when finding a partner? Surely it's only natural to prefer members of the opposite sex – or same sex for that matter – that come from one's own ethnic background. Of course, it doesn't and shouldn't exclude other ethnic groups (thank God), otherwise we wouldn't be the amazingly diverse species we are. Some of the most beautiful women I have seen have been the product of inter-racial partnerships. Long may they continue.
Forgot to say – the one I'm not to keen on is the middle right. She has a hard, cold look – though she could be a very warm, loving person for all I know.
I have preferences. Absolutely. To a very specific race, I don't think so. And not because of some goody two shoes idealistic "equal rights" reasons either. I *tend* to like darker skin tones, or dark hair/eyebrows. But that could be a range of ethnicities. And yet, occassionally I will be attracted to a lighter skinned or blonde hunk. For someone to say they don't have any kind of preferences I think is most likely self decieving. We all do. And to have a preference does not mean in anyway you are then saying you flatout DON'T like something else. Just because my *preference* is to a certain look, does not mean I never like the other.
I PREFER Italian food, doesn't mean I never have a hankering for Mexican. Or a nice little chinese buffet.
@Niccee - That word 'ignorant' is so regularly applied to those making a conscious stand against homo-sexuality, and yet it is NEVER explained just exactly what it is we are supposed to be "ignorant" of.
And, ooooh, I'm in over my head?!
Well, I am a VERY strong swimmer.
“Then did the innocent and beauteous young girls trip from dale to dale and hill to hill with braided locks or flowing tresses, wearing just enough clothing to conceal modestly what modesty seeks and has always sought to hide…But now, in this detestable age of ours, no damsel is safe…Therefore, as times went on and wickedness increased, the order of knight-errantry was instituted to defend maidens, to protect widows, and to rescue orphans and distressed persons.”
from "Don Quixote."
Do what you do best, Batman on wheels.
i don't have any preferences. i like hot guys no matter what race they are
and hey where's my pic ??
I love Asians! X) But my boyfriend's black. Lol.
For a while I've considered Indian/Persian men and women to be most attractive, but culturally I've never been compatible with any. I married an italian (from NY) man with an afro. not sure what the significance is.
@Mangonese - Errr, women aren't actually supposed to have a 'preference' in "their women"! They're not supposed to 'have' "women" at all!
@wholiedtotheblind - Don't forget that many Indian and Persian men (and people in general) are Caucasian. Many high caste Indians and genuine Persians/Iranians are descended from the original Aryans.
As far as that 'line-up' goes, I REALLY like the top-left, right-left, middle-right, and bottom-left...but I've nothing against the others either!
That is so cool of u cuz people say im trampy cuz im white and it really ticks me off. I just want to scream but i just cry. u r 2 cool!
i have preferences but i dont care about race. technically, all poeple are racest to an extent because they are born with it. Other than that i love all poeple.
I love curly brown hair and a good smile! I dont care what race they are.
anyone who actually READS your posts would know that you have an appreciation for all races and that you see beauty in everyone. So those people who make a big deal out of some of your posts must not actually take the time to READ what you're saying.
@S_K_O_T - I'm going to say this nicely:
Fuck off.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhcwyUZdT60
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0xQYP8gXGA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDr57ajoTlU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiF6l-LCLm8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFBWPcaMKeo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YDz-ftqr1g
This is going to happen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHnEWmS1BNc&feature=related
@Colorsofthenight - I don't know who's been in your ear about what nicely is...but that's not nicely.
And I don't know if I really want to look at those things you've suggested. Going by "this is going to happen", are they threats of some sort or another?
@S_K_O_T - That's two different comments there, buddy.
I've tried being nice to you in the past, but your stupidity prevails. I don't have to take your shit, and I won't. You can't tell me what I'm 'supposed' to do or be. Only I know that.
So I say it again, and I want you to leave it alone.
Fuck. Off.
@Mangonese - Yes, I then quickly realised that, but decided to let my intitial response to your oh-so-eloquent "f**k off", and all that implies, stand.
I'm not your buddy. When have you ever been "nice" to me? And, more's the point, who are you to be doling out niceness, with heavily weighted strings attached?
I'm not giving you "shit", I'm telling you the truth...and it's ever so funny that those who demand that no-one tell them what to do, then proceed to tell people what to do!!!
It is NOT only you who tells you what you should be...for, as you prove it, given that licence, people invariably do, and be, the WRONG thing...no, there are things people SHOULD do and ways that people SHOULD be!
That is far above and beyond your vain conceits.
I am REMINDING you of what you should do and be!
I will not, and I cannot, leave it alone!
I will not "f**k off"!
@S_K_O_T - Go screw yourself. If your objective is for me to change who I am, it's not going to work. You may have succeeded in getting a rise out of me, but you will not weaken me and you will not change me.
It's pitiful that you think you're the universal truth. No one is. No one ever will be.
For every woman I have sex with, I'll remember you fondly. <3
@DearRicky - Thanks right! lol
dude, you sound like you don't even have a girlfriend. beauty is in the eye of the beholder my fat ass. you probably put women on a pedestal. in the real world, you don't even have the balls to talk to women, do you? so, how would you even know what the fuck real beauty is? beauty is skin deep mother fucker. it's personality, dipshit. mother fuckers like you, scare away people from wanting to know someone. if every was too scared to know someone, how the fuck are people going to have a chance? you're full of shit dude.
OK, first of all, out of that big cluster of pictures you posted I only find the three on the left to be attractive.
Second, you're absolutely right. There's nothing racist about being attracted to some groups more than others, just like you might be attracted to some hair colors, eye colors, and body types over others. Whenever someone says that they're attracted to all races then that's where my bullcrap detector goes off. The fact is, not everyone looks the same, so there is no way you can find everyone equally attractive. That would be like saying that you find all body types attractive, even those huge fat women that look like elephants. Well, let me modify that a bit, when a person says they have no preference as to race it could also mean that they are so desparate that they will just take whatever they can get.
I'll admit, I'm only attracted to women with either Mongoloid or Caucasoid features, but that isn't racist. Racism is where your attraction is based on bloodline or perceptions about someone's bloodline. You don't want to be with someone because they might be 1% descended from some group you consider inferior. As for me, I don't really care what might be in a persons pedigree as far as race goes so long as at the end of the day they have the kind of looks I like.
If, due to a slip of the tongue, one's political correctness is accused of lacking in quality, one could pehaps make up for this by shooting for quantity, by rattling as many partners as possible in a wide variety of races, could one not?
@S_K_O_T - Preach it!
@rojobe - You think it's more natural to go with a member of your race than a person of the opposite gender?
@Mangonese - Curse you for that last spite-filled statement. Curse you for it!
Just how many 'women' (females that have sex with other females are not women!) are you having sex with, to so glibly refer to "every one" that you're going to have sex with?
Of course, if a male spoke or boasted of the women he was planning on having sex with...then he'd be called a "pig", wouldn't he? So what does that make you?
It's staggering that you (and so many others) can say what you do, seemingly oblivious to what it causes, and count on it not being noticed, and STILL consider yourself to be the "good ones", or worse yet, an "oppressed group"...and people still wonder why there is 'homophobia'!
Look at what is written right there for an example of why! God curse you every time you have sex with a 'woman', and God curse all the "women" you have sex with!
Tell me, just HOW is all of you 'women' having sex with each other supposed to assist the world? Just HOW much can this go on before it is too much, before even you realise it's critical mass? Before it REALLY gets out of control? Before there is a REALLY violent reaction?
You got into having sex with 'women' because YOU ARE WEAK! That's the point!
I have NEVER claimed to be the Universal Truth, you LIAR! God is the Universal Truth!
What, do you think that females having sex with 'every woman' that they can, is the "Universal Truth"? You got ONE thing right...no human being can EVER be the Universal Truth, and that INCLUDES you and all this other vain, malicious, callous, cold-hearted "women" that you are having sex with.
WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO GO AND 'SCREW" MYSELF???? I deserve more than that!
Get a rise out of you? What?! What you are doing is ALL about getting a rise out of people!
What you are doing now is nothing of any such nible strength that you may be "weakened" from it. No, you were weakened and that is WHY you are doing what you are doing. I am NOT trying to change you! You already DID change to indulge in this perversity! I'm endeavouring to return you to your true nature!
No "change" about it!
Again...can you just I-M-A-G-I-N-E the reactions if ANY MAN spoke about the women he plans to have sex with? I mean, REALLY? He would be called a pig, a bastard, a player, a predator, "not me your not having sex with" would be the response, and he'd be laughed into the dust! With how absolutely vain, superficial, queer, affluent, and female-centric that this society has become...you'll say something like that (with the intention of hurting my, and any man's, feelings), and still be see as "good", AND STILL have God know's how many 'women' lining up for a go!
It's wrong, and what you say shows HOW wrong it all is!
You are weak, and all that causes 'lesbianism' is utterly PITIFUL...if ONLY more people could get back to seeing that again!
Curse you for that boast and threat. What you are doing now is NOT "who you are"!
It's got to stop!
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex - I Will !
@S_K_O_T - Yes you still are. How many gays have you known? Did you ask them is they choose? Did you choose? Science had begun to believe its something to do with the y chromosomes passed from the male. They were actually able to make fruit flies attracted to the same sex horse fly.
http://www.skeptictank.org/gaygene.htm do you think the flies choose to be gay? Do you think that someone would choose to be hated by almost everyone and disowned by friends and family? I cant imagine choosing that. You can choose to have sex with the same sex, but not to be attracted to them.
So yes, you are in over your head. If you arent gay, you cant be 100 percent sure of anything
@Mangonese - thank you, that guys so ignorant
@Niccee - No problem. I don't have a problem standing up for myself or anyone else.
@Niccee - There are no 'gays', as some elevated, removed lifeform, to "know". I have known...some...people who have gone 'gay'.
Why is that continually posed as some yardstick? Some excuse? As if knowing anyone doing this will make it all "right"?
I've known someone being a drug-dealer as well...doesn't make that right either!
So what if we do or don't know anyone doing this? It is WRONG by definition! And actually, knowing the people who've gotten into it, seeing what goes on, seeing the attitudes displayed...only makes me hate it that much MORE!
I do not have to know everyone committing any sin to know that it is WRONG!
Science has NOT begun to believe anything about homo-sexuality, and in fact, so far ALL scientific evidence has come down stridently AGAINST there being any immutable cause of it!
Making a life-form do something abnormal and unnatural is NOT an excuse for anything!
As I've had to say before....what those going homo-sexual are choosing is NOT the adverse reaction to what they are doing...that is the CONSEQUENCE of it...what they are arrogantly choosing is the most awfully soft, selfish, lazy, easy, irresponsible, luxuriant, wasteful, perverted, hedonistic life imaginable!
The hate earned by that vanity is the natural response to it. There is NO excuse for the venomous hatred indulged in by those going homo-sexual!
Those going homo-sexual 'disown' so much, and deserve nought but chastisment for such horrible conceit.
How are those going 'gay' "100% sure" of anything then???? How are those who now obstinately refuse to look past the sheltered confines of their own gender "100% sure" of anything???
The only people that could hate homo-sexuality more than me are those who have stopped committing this sin!
As I said, I do NOT have to do evil to know what is evil. It is 100% certain that homo-sexuality is a choice, is wrong, and is evil!
@Niccee - Again, it is never explained...please, TRY and say what you claim I am "ignorant" of?
And why no mention of the OBVIOUS ignorance of those going homo-sexual?
@Mangonese - Standing up for yourself? As though boasting about having sex with lots of different 'women' is something you should be "standing up for yourself" for??? You're NOT a victim!
@S_K_O_T - you just completely dismissed science just because.... I cant argue with someone who is obviously ignorant enough to compare a gay to a drug dealer. You have been severely let down by your religion and your lifestyle. Im sorry the world has failed you so badly.
the bible says that if a woman is not a virgin when she gets married she should be killed....is that still true?
@S_K_O_T - THEY DONT CHOOSE....thats my point. and your completely dismissing it. Just for the fact of you not approving of it.
@Mangonese - He isnt going to get it, dont blame him. He is to far gone to see love and knowledge. He prefers the ignorance of the good book to comfort him at night from his sins.
@Niccee - Yeah. I'm already done with him.
@Niccee - WHEN, and WHERE, did I dismiss Science!
As I said, right up to this moment, ALL extant scientific evidence concludes AGAINST their being any inherent, immutable cause of homo-sexuality!!!!
WHY do you think that somehow Science excuses homo-sexuality? It doesn't!
I didn't completely compare those going 'gay' to drug dealers, those going 'gay' are WORSE! Drug dealing is still known as a crime, homo-sexuality is painted up as a "lifestyle" and is a much more insidious danger!
NO human being is let down by religion!
People let themselves down.
The world has failed itself, and is failing God!
Do YOU think that it's right that anyone should not be a virgin when they are married???
@Niccee - THEY DO CHOOSE! ARROGANTLY!
@Niccee - Get.....WHAT????????
@Niccee - Did you read the part when she was boasting about the 'women' she was going to have sex with? You think that is in any way good, positive, scientific, moral, helpful, okay, or right?????
@Niccee - I have read scientific studies on homosexuality, and the data points to a psychological condition. Any attempts to link it to genetics are self defeating as, given the lifestyle of the individuals, there is no way the gene would ever be passed on. Also, there is no belief in science, as by definition science must be restricted to empirical studies and belief is what you have in the absence of empirical proof.
"the bible says that if a woman is not a virgin when she gets married she should be killed....is that still true?"--Where did you get that idea from? It doesn't say that anywhere in the Bible, and there are plenty of cases in the Bible were men marry non-virgins, although I would NEVER do it myself for many good reasons.
The fact that you even took my comment seriously is hilarious.
@Ambrosius_Augustus_Rex -
" Surely it's only natural to prefer members
of the opposite sex – or same sex for that matter...."
I didn't say ME – I meant in general. I just didn't want to exclude gays in my comment, or does this discussion only include hetero's?
@S_K_O_T - The only venomous hatred I see is yours.
@rojobe - Then actually open your eyes and ears to what is going on. Go on, show some spirit and courage. No, my hatred is pure and righteous, it is a reaction!
@rojobe - Why not? ..."gays" ruthlessly exclude people from their activities. By definition, Heterosexuality is inclusive of all humanity, and homo-sexuality is strictly and maliciously exclusive!
@S_K_O_T - My eyes and ears are open, I just see and hear in a different way from you. I have plenty of spirit and courage to apply when necessary thanks.
@S_K_O_T - 'gays' don't ruthlessly exclude people from their activities – I've been chatted up loads of times!
It seems to me the exclusionist here is you. You're the one who wants to deny their existence and their right to enjoy life and love in a way that is (presumably) different from yours.
Looks might seem to influence us, conscious or unconsciously, it's because we're human beings. We can't deny on that one. But we can choose if we want to go more for the looks or the character.
Personally I still think we are all human beings, we are all the same after all. Even though it might seem to be naive, but we all live on one earth. We have more in common that we have different. But it is up to us to learn about the different cultures, to be a little more tolerant and try to approach one another. No race on this earth has the right to claim their race or culture is better than any other.
So if someone has preferences in what way soever, it is not for us to judge on that person. Some people here are too fast in judging others or call them racist. Well, I know it's so easy....
Just think about it. He didn't offend another race, did he? We all have our preferences. Just because we are attracted to other races or only the same race than ourselves doesn't make us a racist. Come on...
And, what a cruel thing to say soymilk:
“Ricky, too bad you won't be pulling any of ‘em.” I think that's just very stupid and very poor. You should be glad you're healthy. If you were of sound understanding, you wouldn't say such things. Get a life girl.
@rojobe - Thank you. You make me feel good.
"It’s not as if girls actually go for the physically disabled anyway."
Aww Ricky, don't be so hard on yourself. I <3 you for your sexy mind!
@S_K_O_T - no, it's what they do.
@Mangonese - Well, just as long as you feel good, that seems to be the only important thing, doesn't it? Just as long as you feel good. Not be good, mind you, just "feel good".
Well, that ain't good!
@rojobe - No, no, stop, wake up. Homo-sexuality is radically and aggressively exclusionary.
@rojobe - There is not different ways of seeing and hearing things, especially not with such a crucial issue. There is only the complete or incomplete way of seeing and hearing things, there is only the right or wrong way of seeing or hearing things.
@S_K_O_T - "Homo-sexuality is radically and aggressively
exclusionary" – "there is only the right or wrong way of
seeing or hearing things".
I don't know how or where you developed that concept from, but I'm afraid my experience of life and people tells me its unfounded. Of course, there is a right and wrong way as far as the law is concerned but we are talking about something that is not illegal here. People are free to enjoy their sexual preferences and desires in the way they are or in the way they choose.
I can see by your previous comments that you have very closed and judgmental views – possibly radical even – of homosexuality and, no doubt other subjects too, and you will not be changed in your attitudes.
I would be tempted to use the term bigot but I don't really know you, only what I've read here, and of course, you could just be winding a few people up by making inflammatory comments and actually be a really likable, docile gent who wouldn't say boo to a goose.
But I think we are very different, me and you. I see people for what they are and accept them. You see everything that does not conform to your ideology as wrong and unacceptable. You expect everyone to live in a world the way you want it, with no space for those who you judge as unnacceptable.
Trouble is, I fear you would be on your own.
i used to, my Asian best friend even knew how i ranked races and i guess he approved BUT really all of that got blown out of the water in a matter of months, so im sitting here not knowing what to think and letting whoever makes a move, make a move
@rojobe - If people are doing wrong, then absolutely NO, I do not meekly and mutely "accept" that. I am NOT exploring concepts here, I'm telling the truth. That people can have 'sex' with, and only "love", their own gender, and this is in any way 'ok', and can occur without consequence, is what is a very poorly shaped "concept", at best!
Your, or anyone's, limited experience of life is NOT the sole criteria for anything, there are absolutes, and knowing that in every way homo-sexuality is elitist, divisive, exclusionary, parasitic, and evil, is entirely solidly founded!
It is actually the vague, contrived, 'defences' of homo-sexuality that are unfounded!
It is absolutely IRRELEVANT that with some trite alterations of "law" homo-sexuality (which was for all time illegal! is now deemed to be "legal"! Homo-sexuality is IMMORAL so is therefore always truly ILLEGAL!
People do NOT have the "right" to pursue vulgar, arrogant, perverse "sexual preferences"! Once you've started trying to tamper with the law, where do you draw the line with that? AND, once you've decided that one thing that is illegal can be made 'legal', once you've turned the law into only a vague concept, WHY should anyone listen??? By that kind of course logic, those indulging in incest and paedophilia must be allowed to indulge their "sexual preference"!
No, homo-sexuality is IMMORAL, so is by direct matter of course, ILLEGAL!
My view is indeed CLOSED to what is wrong! I AM judgemental of that which is DESERVING of judgement! I am a Radical Conservative!
I am not indulging an 'attitude', I am firm in knowledge, and strident in expression. I do NOT limit myself to a jaded and biased "view"...as people obnoxiously going homo-sexual DO!
It's good that you don't resort to the hackneyed term "bigot", for it is SO worn out and SO often misused! The people pursuing vain, self-involved, misogynistic and misandric 'same-sex' "lifestyles" are the unjustified bigots!
There is NOTHING inflammatory about anything that I say! Why would you venture such a notion forth? It is homo-sexuality that IS inflammatory, as always is the promotion and promulgation of it. Those indulging in, and pushing, homo-sexuality, are constantly inflammatory (flaming?pardon the pun!) in behavious and language...and THEN have the nerve to accuse the people they hurt and offend of wrongdoing in their natural response! Don't get duped into following that track.
Do you know what? I actually really am a very likeabale and for the most part very docile gent! And I've yet to had need to take recourse to saying boo to a goose.
However, when it comes to vulgarity, offense, and social carnage such as homo-sexuality...I'll sure say BOO!
In the strongest voice possible!
With what you say you're also implying that peoplke having sex with their own gender, and people going along with supporting that, amounts to an "ideology". It doesn't!
I subscribe fully to the only true Ideology. And I express it accordingly.
No, I do NOT always see what people are doing and "accept" it...I see how people could and SHOULD be, and I expect them to live up to it!
It's ironic what you say, as you simultaneously support people who've gone homo-sexual...who maliciously and unjustly an entire half of the population as being "unnacceptable" to them!!!!!!
Though sometimes it does indeed SEEM as though I am on my own! And it can be a dreadful feeling. My strength and solace is drawn from the greatest source of all! I would rather be right, and be 'alone', than to be wrong and be popular!
Digging deeper though, away from all the lies and propaganda, when push comes to shove, I dare say that I am not as alone here as you think!
I don't think it's racism if you are more attracted to a certain race. I just don't like when people have a preference and wont give the other races a chance. For me I find Black men more attractive, and I I find Caucasian and Indian women more attractive. But it's not like I wont give the other races a chance. If I found a guy or girl who was another race I wouldn't not date them just because I'm more attracted to Black men and Caucasian and Indian women.
I notice a lot of people saying they like your posts before when your talking about humorous subjects, but I like these more to be honest.
I particularly think Asians are a lot more beautiful then any race, as children and adults. But I've been attracted to all races. I have a hard time at looking people in the face, so I can never judge by beauty, and I typically go by personality, because of that. People call me a liar for saying that. But whatever I don't mind. But as far as pictures go I would pick an Asian.
Ha, "Dear White Women"! Hahjahaha so comical lol. I love the wit! As for preferences in your pictures - I like the one in the middle.
@S_K_O_T -
You make statements and call them fact. Just because you come out with these things does not make them fact at all. You say things are wrong – without authority, just because you believe them to be so, even when they have been accepted by society in general. You judge others as if you have a God given right to. Who are you to judge others and label them in the way that you do, calling them arrogant and vain among plenty of other things when you display those traits in your own arguments and attitudes.
You know very well, as I do that incest and paedophilia will stay outside of the law. There is a big difference between those acts and that of homosexuality (and by homosexuality I am mean true love and a loving relationship between two people of the same sex, not just the act of homosexual sex).
Nothing you have said would lead me to even consider what you are saying is right, correct, or acceptable to me or should be accepted by others. I would say you are the one who is wrong. It is the unswerving narrow-mindedness that you display in your statements that fueled the Nazis and Fascists of the 30s and 40s. The same attitudes that many white people held about the blacks in America less that a hundred years ago. The same intolerance that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda display as they try to justify their acts of violence on ordinary men, women and children around the world.
So, if you had your way and homosexuals were eradicated (they would have to be, because they did not necessarily choose their sexuality but were born into it – and please don't deny that too, saying they have a choice, because I know from experience it's not a switch that can be turned off and on at whim – I remind you, I am talking about more than just the act of sex here) who next? the Jewish? Muslims? Athiests? Disabled?
We're going round in circles here. You're repeating phrases and statements that sound like you've
been indoctrinated or programmed in some way and there is no room for the things you say in my mind. I think we should agree on one thing. That we will never agree with each other.
Personality is everything, as it should be, I honestly think looks should come secound when deciding who you are going to date. If you are just hangin out with someone, there looks should not matter, But I still see everyday that is not the case with some people. But then again, I know who I am, and I don't blame the way my parents raised me and let them decide how I am going to love or who I am going to be friends with
I know how it is for myself, so it's all cool.
@rojobe - It is always startlingly clear that those struggling to hold up the shaky construct of liberalism are trapped in an inner conflict...everything that you've said, is obviously an argument with yourself! However, as always goes with liberals, the attempt is made to reflect these things onto others, in this case, me.
And people going homo-sexual can just "come out" with things, liberals can just make brash statements and THIS amounts to fact???
Try telling me ONE thing that I have stated that is not a fact!
Do you not realise that the more you try and lower the level of proper society, it shows the depths to which the queer "society" has descended, that the more you try and shake the foundations of truth and tradition, then how ever more apparent the weakness of liberalism is proven to be?!
The ONLY thing that liberalism and the homo-sexual lobby have are unfounded, baseless statements, which are, in effect, lies.
As I said, if you let one bad thing slide, then who is ANYONE to stop anyone else doing anything? There is NO genuine love between people of the same gender, this vain, easy, egotistic, self-adoration is NOT akin to the true love that is only between a man and a woman!
I'm very glad you recognised my parallels with Fascism and Nazism during the 1930's! Many people admired them then, and the order they were bringing back to shattered, demoralised, divided, corrupted nations...as I do now! The Fascists and Nazis did many good things, more than you likely realise, to make their societies better. There ARE some things I disagree with, however, I largely draw upon the elemental, honourable, traditional precepts of Fascism and Nazism. We indeed need men like those that motivated those movements, and such ideals again now
The last hundred years has indeed proven that most of the attitude towards Black people as shown by the great many Americans, and others around the world a century ago, to be entirely proven to be right!
What do YOU think was wrong with that attitude? What do YOU think that on the whole might have debunked it?
The Taliban COULD have been great, but they messed it up royally, as has Al-Qaeda!
And, as I've pointed out, RIGHT after making glib statements about MY making statements as facts, then YOU go and trot out that RUBBISH about people being "born homo-sexual"! This is a LIE! There is absolutely NOTHING that confirms that! The lies told by, guess who? 'homo-sexuals'! Does NOT count as conclusive evidence! Many people that commit sins and crimes are ever ready to rationalise and justify their behaviour.
Gee, as with all those teetering along the precarious liberal tightrope, you've got quite the conflicting bunch of groups to "defend" and causes to celebrate!
Jews? Oh yes, make no mistake about it, I have a MAJOR problem with many Jews! ALL non-Jews should! Wake up!
Muslims? I am a Muslim, one who 'submits to God'. I have a problem with a great many Muslims though!
Many Muslims are stridently opposed to the Jews and to Zionism...and both genuinely religious Jews, and all Muslims, are properly opposed to homo-sexuality! Which both The Torah/Bible and The Qu'ran rightly call a major sin! Many Muslims sided with the Nazis and served in the Waffen SS during WWII. Many Muslims see any disability as being the mark of the Devil. The Nazis had certain ideas about how to deal with various disabled people, and the burden they often put upon society. Many disabled people endure lives of incredible pain and anguish, often very bravely, but nevertheless. So-called "Atheism" is the BIGGEST lie of all...and directly leads to all liberalism, and homo-sexuality! Communism was state "Atheism" AND even the Communists were stridently opposed to the degeneracy and anti-socialism of homo-sexuality!!!!
So there's a LOT of things you're trying to reconcile there!
Do you really think you should try?
Gosh, you want to talk about indoctrination and programming? YOU show yourself to be very 'well' brainwashed by liberal/leftist indoctrination, and heavily programmed by political correctness, as SO many are today! As I said, there is CLEARLY an inwardly directed argument going on within yourself!
No, with what you're trying to sell, and with what I KNOW, there can be NO agreement amongst us at the moment. That's your fault.
Racial preferences do not work. They don't. Not everybody looks like those people in the pictures.
@S_K_O_T - It was fun at first, but your inane arguments are becoming more and more ludicrous and less and less interesting.
With an attitude like yours' I doubt very much that you have any knowledge of homosexuality at all – I fear you'd either run a mile or shoot them on sight! I count myself lucky to have several long-term friends who are homosexual and therefore I KNOW what I am talking about, whereas you have developed your attitudes from the words of others, written in books a long time ago when the world was a very different place. Those same books have been interpreted by many in many different ways and that's the problem with them.
I would not be proud to be associated with Nazism or Fascism, the Taliban or Al-Qaeda and the thought that you can in any way justify any of their actions and attitudes reviles me.
I have no inner conflict – I am perfectly at peace with myself. I don't
really have the time or inclination to take this any further.
@rojobe - In these times fo trouble, it is those who feel "perfectly at peace with themselves" usually have the MOST to be frightened of! And should be the most feared! Those that are comfortab;y at peace with such time of confusion and rampant degeneracy are in real trouble.
Again, a liberal takes something that someone has said, ignores much, edits much, and whittles it down to something else.
I expressed the complexities of my relationship to Fascism and Nazism. I, like other good people, would want a more absolute Fascism, a truly spiritual Fascism.
There WERE very dangerous elements and movements that REQUIRED the rise of Fascism and Nazism, that you should investigate, and such demonic forces are rampant again. There were SOME things wrong with Fascism and Nazism, and I conveyed that as well. This all pales though, in relation to the carnage, on so many levels, wrought by the evils of Marxism, Communism, Liberalism, and Democracy!
The GREATEST irony of gullible liberals that rant so voiciferously against Fascism, is that via Liberalism they are actually setting themselves up for the WORST kind of "Fascism" of all! The corrupt oppression of 'Political Correctness' that we suffer under now, via Marxism, and ultimately to the Satanic yoke of money, of Illuminatic/Zionist/Masonic rule.
It's amazing, that people...who in order to "allow" all manner of depravity...claim that there are 'no rules', or that the "old" rules don't count anymore, then RUSH to contrive new "rules" to now presume to 'allow' what tradition rightly FORBIDS!
True Fascism and Nazism are based upon age-old codes of honour and nobility...Liberalism, which is based entirely upon the Ego, is based upon NOTHING of worth, yet will be, and IS, enforced with the most stifling regimentation.
There was case recently in which only Muslim migrants protested the introduction of a book into a pre-school about "lesbian mothers"...and, of course, the left-wing liberals were caught in such a bind! Some of their cause celebre's...Muslims and "gays", in conflict...WHO do they side with? Is being 'Feminist' and pro-queer, more important that being 'culturally sensitive' , pro-migration? WHICH "tolerance" would win out???
Of course, the judgement went in favour of the Muslims! Which is good, for now. It is highly ironic though, and actually deeply troubling, that some migrants into a country have a better morality than some of the people of that country. The next irony being, that those who claim to oppose Fascism, and extremist Islam...via Liberalism, 'Political Correctness', and unchecked "tolerance", ARE setting themselves up ultimately for being turned into a harshly ruled Sultanate!!!!
Liberalism is actually the strictest of prisons, with not-so-obvious bars.
Liberalism is NOT actually an achievement, nor is it even a backwards step, it is a step up a dead end.
Genuine Fascism is a RESTORATION of Tradition, which is the ONLY way to forge on healthily and truly peacefully into a proper future!
Yes, I have real "knowledge" of homo-sexuality...and, really, there's not that much to "know"...and that is WHY I hate it even more.
I have had friends who went 'gay' and 'lesbian'. We are NOT friends anymore!
What genuine KNOWLEDGE do those arrogantly going homo-sexual have of REAL LIFE????
Ultimately, SO WHAT if you have several long term friends who went homo-sexual?
Then your opinion is BIASED!
It's funny the game played by those pushing homo-sexuality as well, for instance, if a man speaks against homo-sexuality or 'lesbianism', then the snide assumption os made that he lost a girlfriend or wife that turned "lesbian", and so his opinion is "subjective" and 'doesn't count'....YET, the point is often made by people rashly defending homo-sexuality that they've got friends or family that are "gay"....and, hey presto, THAT counts!!!!??????
If you hada long term friend that was a paedophile would you 'defend' them? Or anyone else that committed any other sin/crime? Because homo-sexuality is the "hot" sin, it is often overlooked by otherwise good, decent people...thus, homo-sexuality is THE worst, most insidiously corrupting sin, by which all manner of horrors befall humanity!
I do not have to be friends with paedophiles, murderers, or thieves, to know that these things are all WRONG! There ARE central yardsticks to which we all are concerned, there IS absolute morality...homo-sexuality is wrong ON PRINCIPLE. It hurts and damages personally and socially, and so I HATE it personally and on PRINCIPLE!
If you were a TRUE friend you should TELL your friends when they are doing wrong!
I ONLY call for the execution of those going homo-sexual when they have obstinately failed to heed all warnings and advice!
You are hijacked by the vain words and actions of others, I am inspired by the absolute WORDS, timeless WORDS, the WORD of TRUTH!
The world both IS and IS NOT a different place! Try and explain the "difference" that you assume now 'allows' homo-sexuality'?
If the world was to become, as you say "different", yet again, would paedophila and incest THEN become "okay"? Due to the changing whims of some vapid hedonists, and some maliciously calculated new "laws"????
God is absolute, the human psyche and soul NEVER change, right is always right, wrong is always wrong, the meaning of life is continual, the Books are EVER right and EVER relevant!!!!
Nothing that I've said is ludicrous. Try and explain what is "inane" about anything I've said, because none of it is!
@S_K_O_T - There is no point in trying to 'explain' anything to you because you think you know everything and just ignore or distort anything that resembles sense or reason.
You've sunk so far into the mire that bogs you down you can no longer escape from it. What's more, you're blind to the hole you're in for you try to pull anyone who approaches you into it too. They offer you a hand hold, a way to start pulling yourself free from the slime that pulls at your body and mind but you reject them all, safe in the knowledge that you're right and everyone else is wrong. And all the while you sink deeper.
There's a reason that democracy is the prevalent system throughout the world. There's a reason that the nazis, the fascists and communists are all but gone. There's a reason that tyrants never leave a legacy that others want to keep. There's a reason that the radical islamists in all their forms have to fight to gain ground anywhere and only hold it by the rule of fear and oppression.
But of course, you would distort those facts too. And all the while you sink deeper.
I offered you a hand. I offered you a way of looking at things and thinking them through for yourself. A chance to start pulling yourself free from everything that bogs you down.
But all I can do is watch as you wriggle and squirm, repeating the mantra's that your dulled mind has become addicted to. And all the while you sink deeper.
So now you're incapable of thinking for yourself. You clutch at straws here and there, associating yourself with all you ad-mire (ooo look a pun), but really you're just cherry picking at anything that will help to convince yourself that where you are is right and good. And all the while you sink deeper.
Your ears are blocked, your eyes are closed. Your head is turned upward and so you can shout. But all anyone here can hear is the inane rants of someone who's about to go under.
May God open your eyes to His truth. May He fill you with love for your brothers and sisters. May He set you free.
Unlike God, I do not have infinite patience and perseverance and after banging my head against a brick wall for far too long, I am going to stop. I will not respond to any more of your posts, so there's little point in you doing so, though I know you can not resist having the last word. Go on. Prove me wrong – it may just the your first step on the road to enlightenment.
@rojobe - No, you won't try and explain anything further, because the flimsy liberal approach bears NO explaining and holds up to ZERO scrutiny!
There ARE Fascists and Nazis...AND Communists....still around....and NOT always in the manner that you'll assume!
And it is high time for a new Fascist insurgency, for a revolt of conscience!
Democracy, the politics of doubt and confusion, is (or SEEMS like!) the dominant system around the world because it has been forced so, has been MADE to seem so. Make no mistake though, much Democracy is very limited, and serves devious ends.
Whilst at the MOMENT, in the temporal world, and in this ever more congested, vulgar, depraved 'society', I AM "bogged down"....my spirit and my intellect, thank God, are FREE!
And I WILL be a stick in the mud of this vulgar quagmire of a 'society' that has SO many, including yourself, stuck.
There HAS to be some genuine sticks in this mud, so other people have something firm to grasp onto to pull themselves out!
You're semi-right, while I myself THINK, and think clearly, I do NOT solely "think for myself"!
That is MUCH of the problem now, people's thoughts, people's horizon, stops right at themselves!
And, NO, as with ALL liberals/libertarians, it is YOUR eyes and ears that are obstinately closed and blocked. Like silly, spoiled, bratty children (yet MUCH worse), the liberal approach ALWAYS resorts to the eyes snapped shut, hands slammed over ears.."nah nah nah, I can't hear you", level, and it's a low level!
God HAS opened my eyes to his Truth! That is what I am drawing upon and pointing TO!
If you actually think that God's "truth" is that the sin of homo-sexuality is somehow "OK", then you are seriously deluded, and if you claim so, then YOU ARE A LIAR!
You, and all others trying to undermine God's way, to conceitedly spurn God's Law, who blaspheme, and yet who then so arrogantly presume to speak for God, are SERIOUSLY wayward, and should REALLY watch yourselves.
Why obtuse vanity....that YOU have to be patient with ME?
I'M defending RIGHT! You are pushing WRONG!
It's good people, like me, who are constantly called upon to be ever-so-patient, with people such as yourself!
YOU are pushing the breaking of Law, and the breaking with tradition, so the onus is 100% upon YOU to try and prove all of that "wrong"!!!!
You dare mention Enlightenment? Whilst pushing lifestyles that are mired in the lowest form of egotism???
YOU should ponder what true Enlightenment is!
i have to admit that i have been getting a little fed up with the race posts also, as race is not an ongoing issue in my life so it doesn't always fit in with my agenda. i would never delete though because you are a magnificent person with very insightful ideas. there is nothing wrong with having a preference in race! calling that a racist comment would be like saying you couldnt have a preference in hair or eye color, or cat breeds, or body stature!
I don't think I have a particular preference. I'm just attracted to whoever is attractive and interesting. But in the past I've dated only white guys, but only because that whom I'm around.
Comments are closed.